« In Case Cooperstown Is Not Keeping Count | Main | Curse Jersey Current Bid: $7,100.00 »
April 17, 2008
Manny To Follow Damon On Haircut Trail?
Is there a chance that the Red Sox do not pick up Manny Ramirez' contract option for 2009?
Related, what happens if the Yankees do not bring back Bobby Abreu next season? You know that Jason Giambi will be gone after this year. Does the money saved on Giambi and Abreu, coupled with the need for a right-fielder and three-hitter (if Abreu leaves), bring cause for the Yankees to chase a 37-year old Manny Ramirez on the free agent market?
Me? In my lifetime, I've seen some great right-handed batters play: Jeff Bagwell, Edgar Martinez, Alex Rodriguez, Frank Thomas and Albert Pujols come to mind. And, I'd put Manny Ramirez up there with any of them - if not on the top of the list. But...man...the whole Manny being Manny thing...in Yankeeland? I dunno. I just don't know...
What about you? How would you feel about "Manny In Pinstripes '09"?
Posted by Steve Lombardi at April 17, 2008 12:28 PM
Comments
What about you? How would you feel about "Manny In Pinstripes '09"?
==============================================
I would feel terribly about it. I hate that preening, loafing, arrogant son of a bitch. The whole "Manny being Manny" thing is revolting. No one gets more of a free pass for bad behavior in all of baseball.
Posted by: MJ
at April 17, 2008 12:47 PM
He's horrible defensively, or at least well below average if you take into account that he plays LF in Fenway, but he sure can hit. If the plan was full time DH, then sure, I could see it. Yankee fans would get over Manny being on the Yankees after he hits 40 HR and drives in 130 runs.
Posted by: j
at April 17, 2008 12:53 PM
Wow Steve...you and Pete Abe posting on basically the same topic right at the same time. Creepy.
Anyway, while the $20 million option for next year is a lot of money, I can't really picture a scenario where the Sox don't pick it up. Manny seems to have bounced back from his "down" year last season, and despite all the baggage he brings along (and his baggage is nothing compared to, say, Bonds' in my opinion) the guy can flat out rake. They'd be hard pressed to replace his bat in the lineup.
Posted by: bfriley76
at April 17, 2008 01:16 PM
Manny is a great hitter and his antics obviously don't prevent his team from winning, since he's won two world series.
I don't think the Red Sox would be dumb enough to not pick up his option because that team wouldn't be squat without Manny in the middle of the lineup.
If they don't pick up the option, I wouldn't mind seeing Manny as a DH only on the Yankees.
Posted by: antone
at April 17, 2008 01:45 PM
For the right money and the right number of years I'd take him. I don't think Manny would take what what "right" money and years are from the Yanks.
All Manny does is get hits and he kills the Yankees. All in all I don't think there is anyway it would happen.
Posted by: Mike
at April 17, 2008 01:47 PM
No!
Posted by: Don
at April 17, 2008 02:41 PM
Just what the Yankees need, another ancient DH. Pass.
Posted by: Tex Antoine
at April 17, 2008 02:52 PM
I'd take him in a second. He's automatic. I think he is the best right handed hitter in the game and has been for years. I think we all focus on his ridiculous antics and don't realize that this guy owns ever pitcher he faces. What hitter would you least like to face in a key situation? My vote unanimously goes to Manny.
Posted by: D. Baseball 23
at April 17, 2008 08:27 PM
I'm sure idiotic bandwagon fans will be booing the heck of him. I don't really care - as long as he doesn't suck, I'm fine with it.
Posted by: Retire21
at April 18, 2008 12:42 AM
Am I the only Yankee fan who kind of likes Manny Ramirez? He's such a goofball, you can't stay mad at him for even a second. Plus, he's from NYC.
Oh yeah, and he can hit.
Posted by: Jordan Meisner
at April 18, 2008 04:33 AM
Yeah, I'd take Manny.
*Manny is a great hitter and his antics obviously don't prevent his team from winning, since he's won two world series.*
Don't think you can use that criteria; he's won twice in 15 seasons. What happened the other 12 years (1994 was the strike year)
Posted by: Raf
at April 18, 2008 10:04 AM
"Don't think you can use that criteria; he's won twice in 15 seasons. What happened the other 12 years (1994 was the strike year)"
It's a silly way to judge him, but since you asked in his 11 seasons his team didn't win the world series, (Not counting 93 [only had 53 ABs] or 94[the strike]) they went to the playoffs 7 times, and never posted a losing record.
