« Posting Issues? | Main | YankeesHeroes.org »
March 15, 2007
Floats Like A Butterfly.....
First, and foremost, I am a Yankees fan. But, I’m also a big fan of baseball in general. And, I love baseball history. If the study of baseball history were a swimming pool, I would want to cannonball-in and float around in it until I started to prune-up. And, even then, I would not leave without a fight.
Being a fan of baseball history, I like to look at the careers of particular players and study them. For example, I’ve always been fascinated by the career of Roberto Alomar.
Roberto Alomar was a full-time major leaguer at the early age of twenty. And, within two years, he was an All-Star. In fact, Alomar was an All-Star twelve times in his career. He also finished in the “top ten” of his league’s MVP voting five times. By the time he was 29-years old, many considered Roberto Alomar to already be a future Hall-of-Famer and some thought that he had a chance to break the all-time record for most hits in a career. And, Roberto is considered to be one of the best fielding ever at his position (of second base). His ten Gold Gloves tie into that claim.
Yet, when I look at Roberto Alomar’s career, the one thing that stands out the most to me is the fact that he never stayed with one team more than 5 years. And, most of the time, he only stayed with a team for around 3 years. Note the following, in terms of the teams that Alomar played for, and how long he was with each team:
Padres – 3 years
Blue Jays – 5 years
Orioles – 3 years
Indians – 3 years
Mets – 1.5 years
White Sox – 1 year (over two seasons)
Diamondbacks – ½ a year
How could a player (as good as Roberto Alomar) – someone who is considered to be one of the best non-first baseman infielders to ever play the game – be allowed to move around from team-to-team, so often, and never really stay with one team for an extended period (beyond 5 years)?
Some, here, may be thinking “But, Alomar was the one who made to move to the Orioles and Indians, as a Free Agent.” Yes, this is true. However, I would answer that with “But, the teams who had him before those moves could have opted to tie him up, with a nice contract, and they elected to let him go. So, that has to be considered here as well.” The ability to be a Free Agent, twice in his career, is not the main reason why Roberto Alomar was so nomadic in his career. There’s got to be more to it than that.
In any event, is Roberto Alomar the greatest player ever to play for 5 different teams in a 13 year period? I once asked some friends this question and they suggested that he’s in the team picture with guys like Dick Allen, Gary Sheffield, Frank Robinson and Rickey Henderson. (I never bother to check to see if these guys fit the 5/13 mold. But, I agree with my friends that these players were great ones who moved around a lot at some point in their career.) The same friends also mentioned, at that time, that Alex Rodriguez has played for 3 different teams in the last 7 years. And, if he opts out of his contract after 2007, he could make it 4 different teams in a 9 year period.
When you look at A-Rod’s career, to-date, it is as follows:
Mariners – 5 full years
Rangers – 3 years
Yankees – 4 years (including 2007)
Roberto Alomar started off with a 3/5/3 split. If Alex Rodriguez plays for a team other than the Yankees in 2008, his (full season) split will be 5/3/4. That’s pretty close.
Maybe A-Rod will have a career like Alomar – meaning he’ll be someone who was a star at a very young age, pegged as a future Hall-of-Famer before the age of thirty, and considered one of the best to ever play his position, and yet moved around a lot during his career and never stayed with one team for more than 5 full seasons? It’s an interesting question – and one that’s not a wild notion (based on what we know so far). I’m starting to believe that it may be very possible.
Posted by Steve Lombardi at March 15, 2007 11:35 AM
Comments
i truly think Arod WILL opt-out after the season. whatever happens during the season can be used as motivation. 1. he has a disappointing season, with all the booing and media pressure, and leaves bc he 'doesn't feel wanted,' OR 2. has a great season, and leaves bc his value is at its highest. and let us not forget reason #1, Scott Boras. of course, even when he does opt-out, it doesn't preclude him from resigning with the Yanks.
But if he does leave, i honestly wouldn't care all that much. maybe the focus on 2008 will be on actual baseball. and there's the possibility of DJ moving to 3b while AGon takes over at SS. a downgrade offensively, but an upgrade on defense. and who's to say the Yanks wont sign Andruw Jones or Ichiro (and move Damon/Matsui to 1b), which would replace a lot of Arod's offense if he left?
Posted by: Travis G.
at March 15, 2007 03:08 PM
A very interesting entry, Steve. I've long been fascinated by Alomar too. For all intents and purposes, we can ignore the White Sox and the Diamondbacks. At that time, he was just playing like an old player and hanging on for dear life.
Still, the usual explanation for such a career is that he was a clubhouse cancer. I never heard that many negative clubhouse stories about Alomar, though. (He's no Rogers Hornsby, who also played on more teams than a player of his stature should have. The Alexander biography of Hornsby, by the way, was a very interesting read.)
What I find most interesting about Alomar though is that he fell into the trap that seems to ensnare a lot of second basemen. For some reason, second basemen have a habit of not aging very well. Knoblauch and Baerga are probably the best, most recent examples of this.
If I wanted to take a stab on why second basemen seem to get washed up in their early 30s, I would guess that they are usually not good enough hitters to justify moving to another easier position like 1B, a corner OF slot, or DH. So, when their fielding slips, they're out of a job.
Posted by: jonm
at March 15, 2007 03:28 PM
Looking more specifically at Alomar's moves, I can see why they happened. When he left Baltimore, Baltimore was being run by Syd Thrift, who at that time was at the height of his incompetence. When he left Cleveland, Cleveland was at the end of the run and they were starting their re-building effort. Looking at it this way, the only unexplained occasion upon which Alomar changed teams was when he left Toronto (also a re-building organization at the time) for the millions of Peter Angelos.
Posted by: jonm
at March 15, 2007 03:43 PM
That's an interesting point jonm.
Most cases, 2B's do have some short-comings in their "D" - or else they would be a SS - this is why so few players are drafted at 2B and most 2B's at the pro-level are converted from another position, like SS or 3B. But, that would not explain the hitting drop off - which is what really drives them out of the game. Because, if they can really hit, like Carew or Jeff Kent, they will be moved.
I really don't know what the answer could be to that one.
Posted by: Steve Lombardi
at March 15, 2007 03:47 PM
~~I really don't know what the answer could be to that one.~~
We could make some speculative hypotheses. One could be that they take a disproportionate share of hits when they make the pivot and injuries derail their whole games sooner. Another could be that second basemen happen to be less athletic than other position players. They lack the strength of the guys who play the power positions (corner OF, 1B, or 3B). And they lack the speed and reflexes of shortstops and center fielders. Because of this, when they slip just a little bit in their early 30s, they quickly fall below replacement level and leave the big leagues.
Based on evidence, I would be very leery of giving a second baseman a long contract after they hit 30. Even Craig Biggio had his last great season at age 33.
Posted by: jonm
at March 15, 2007 04:29 PM
No one in their right mind will give A-Rod the dough to cover ~80 million over 3 years. Still, Hicks proved that not all owners are in their right mind. If he leaves, it won't be for money, but rather to get the pressure of his back.
Posted by: #15
at March 15, 2007 05:00 PM
Baerga's problem wasn't that he didn't age well, it's that a lot of his value was tied up in batting average. That caught up to him in his age-27 season.
As for Alomar, he has some interesting comps over at baseball reference;
Lou Whitaker (858)
Frankie Frisch (849) *
Julio Franco (840)
Barry Larkin (840)
Ryne Sandberg (834) *
Joe Morgan (828) *
Charlie Gehringer (821) *
Craig Biggio (816)
George Davis (815) *
Vada Pinson (804)
I didn't expect to see Lou Whitaker there in the top spot
Posted by: Raf
at March 15, 2007 05:22 PM
If he leaves, it won't be for money, but rather to get the pressure of his back.
============
Whoever gets him will get production similar to his time in NY. Unless he goes to Colorado, of course.
Of course, it should be mentioned;
H/R splits, 2006 (BA-OBP-SLG-OPS)
H: .311/.398/.572/.970
R: .270/.386/.474/.860
Looks like 2004 was the only year where he did better on the road than he did at home. Interesting
Posted by: Raf
at March 15, 2007 05:32 PM
If my math is right, Alomar's production fell off a cliff after his 11th MLB season. I don't think anyone is projecting that with A-Rod.
You are also forgetting one HUGE factor with Alomar. The Hirschbeck spit in the face incident. I think that episode made him persona non grata around baseball for a while and may have been representative of his personality in general. Angry, and brooding. I lived in MD when he was with the Os and he was by most accounts unapproachable and dicky.
And of course his talent isn't close to A-Rod's, so I'm not sure one would pick Alomar as a good representative analog for Rodrigu....oh wait, yeah I know why.
Posted by: SteveB
at March 15, 2007 06:17 PM
Alomar was a victim of two of biggest fire sales in recent history - the mid-90's Blue Jays and the 2001/2002 Indians. That's the biggest reason why he's bounced from team to team. I don't think there's much more too it than that.
Posted by: christopher
at March 15, 2007 07:04 PM
~~Baerga's problem wasn't that he didn't age well, it's that a lot of his value was tied up in batting average. That caught up to him in his age-27 season.~~
Of course, those aren't mutually exclusive options. His reflexes slipped a tad and there went the batting average.
This rumor from B-R's Bullpen page may have had something to do with Baerga's troubles:
"Rumor has it that back in 1996, Baerga was sleeping with Indians' closer Jose Mesa's wife. Mesa demanded "either he goes or I go," and Baerga was then shipped off to the Mets with Alvie Espinoza for Jeff Kent and Jose Vizcaino."
Great trade for the Indians by the way; talk about making lemonade from lemons!
Posted by: jonm
at March 15, 2007 07:39 PM
~~~If my math is right, Alomar's production fell off a cliff after his 11th MLB season. I don't think anyone is projecting that with A-Rod.
And of course his talent isn't close to A-Rod's, so I'm not sure one would pick Alomar as a good representative analog for Rodrigu....oh wait, yeah I know why. ~~~
SteveB - you're right. When you compare Alomar, at the age A-Rod is now, to Alex, yes, A-Rod is twice the hitter that Alomar was. That said, it seems even more odd that A-Rod will play for 4 different teams in a 9 year period, no?
Posted by: Steve Lombardi at March 15, 2007 10:49 PM
~~That said, it seems even more odd that A-Rod will play for 4 different teams in a 9 year period, no?~~
If this happens, I really don't see it as odd at all. ARod's bizarrely large contract makes him historically unique. Texas felt the contract was inhibiting the development of the team. Based on the fact that Texas still hasn't made the playoffs since the ARod trade and that they still pay a large portion of the contract, it looks like that trade was a miscalculation on their part.
A-Rod negotiated an opt-out clause in good faith and, if he either wants to use it to get a lucrative extension from another team or just to leave NY, that's his right. I still find it somewhat hard to believe that any other team would be willing to give him an unsubsidized $160 million for his age 32-37 seasons. If ARod has to move to 1B (now it looks like he might have to), he simply is not worth that much money. On the other hand, if the Yankees decide to give him an extension, the same ARod seasons would cost them $130 million and the Rangers $30 million. I'm not even sure that he's worth that much. Either way, it's a good thing for the Yankees. In effect, they have ARod in a pseudo-option year.
Posted by: jonm at March 15, 2007 11:19 PM
...it seems even more odd that A-Rod will play for 4 different teams in a 9 year period, no?
==========
Not really. As been shown before, he isn't the first talented player to move around.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 16, 2007 10:38 AM
