« Matsui's Collection | Main | The Return Of Lee Maz »

November 02, 2005

Matt Lawton Busted For Steroids

The Mystery 'Roider has been uncovered. From Newsday:

Matt Lawton has tested positive for steroids, Newsday has confirmed. Major League Baseball is expected to make an announcement later today.

The positive test for Lawton, who was traded to the Yankees on Aug. 28, was first reported by Deadspin.com.

Lawton filed for free agency earlier this week. In 21 games with the Yankees, Lawton struggled, going only 6-for-48 (.125).

After he did not make the postseason roster, he asked to leave the team and head home instead of sticking around in the event he was needed as an injury replacement.

Lawton faces a 10-day suspension at the start of next season, or once he joins a major-league team if it is after the season opener.

Earlier this week, when the "rumor" was leaked, Will Carroll, in other sources, was quoted as saying "Yes" when asked "Is this a name we're actually going to care about?"

We care about Matt Lawton?

I'd be more upset if a Yankees Bat Boy tested positive. Lawton? Who cares? He's a ship in the night. Lawton could have turned out to be [fill in the blank] and no one would care about it.

Yawn.

Posted by Steve Lombardi at November 2, 2005 05:09 PM

Comments

Well, like I said before...

"The nose of a mob is its imagination. By this, at any time, it can be quietly led." - Edgar Allan Poe

Put away your torches and pitchforks, guys. Wait until next time...

Posted by: Raf [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2005 05:36 PM

For arguments sake, let's say he tested positive when he was with the Cubs, and the Cubs management was aware of it. Would they have any responsibility to disclose that information to the Yankees before the trade was made?

I understand there are privacy issues with disclosing information like this. But shouldn't there be something in place to protect teams that want to trade for a player who, unbeknownst to them, is in the appeals process for violating the steroid policy?

Posted by: Jen [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2005 07:45 PM

Unfortunately the HIPAA privacy act is ironclad.

If the patient or his representative doesn't want you to know his condition, you're stuck. Medical info is at the discretion of the patient. I'm a hospital chaplain who deals with this stuff every day. If you are in for a routine procedure and tell admitting that you don't want anyone to know you are at the Hospital, and a close relative, son or daughter, calls in and asks for you, the response will be "We don't have a patient by that name..."

These regulations are the most bizarre, and have the heftiest fines you can imagine; @250,000.00 for the first offense!! I've rambled a bit, let me know if I can answer more questions.\

Scott

Posted by: Scott Coulter [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2005 09:33 PM

If the guy had AIDS, and the Cubs knew it, and then didn't tell the Yankees when they traded him, then HIPAA would be the rule and the Cubs did the right thing.

But, juicing is not an illness or condition - it's an offense. This is no different than if he was suspended for attacking an umpire, and appealed it, and was under appeal at the trade - meaning that it was something that the Cubs should have shared.

This all said, it would be interesting to know when he tested positive, and how long the appeal was, etc. At least it would be as a Yankees fan. I think I would want to know if the Yankees would be willing to trade for someone who they knew tested positive (and the suspension was pending).

Posted by: Steve Lombardi [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2005 11:24 PM

I have to believe that the Yanks or any other team, for that matter, would trade for a player on the juice if the price was right. The team itself isn't sanctioned if its players are juicing so as long as major prospects aren't dealt, why not? After all, the Yanks signed the Giambino knowing full well that one day the reckoning would come. No regrets whatsoever as far as I'm concerned. Lawton's a loser but who cares -- he had a huge homer for us on 9/21 which was as important to our division title run as anyone else's contribution.

Posted by: MJ [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 09:58 AM

I have to believe that the Yanks or any other team, for that matter, would trade for a player on the juice if the price was right.
===================================

Exactly, and not just steroids. History has shown that. Strawberry wasn't signed because he was a reclaimation project, he was signed because despite all he did, he could still get around on a fastball.

Taking the moral high road may be nice, but it wont win you many games. You think the Cards would've liked to have Keith Hernandez back in '85?

Posted by: Raf [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 10:48 AM

I'd be more upset if a Yankees Bat Boy tested positive. Lawton? Who cares? He's a ship in the night. Lawton could have turned out to be [fill in the blank] and no one would care about it.

Yawn.
===================

Yep. Doesn't fit an agenda, so let it slip by the wayside.

The sheep have spoken :D

Maybe Carroll meant that we should care about Lawton b/c we should care about "all" users instead of just the *stars*

If juicing is/was such a big deal, then it should matter whether the guy juicing is the last guy on the bench or your all-star cleanup hitter.

Posted by: Raf [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 11:00 AM

Good point about Strawberry and Keith Hernandez.

I genuinely don't care about steroids. Not that I'm in favor of guys cheating; I'm just tired of hearing about it. I'm tired of the innuendo and the dipshits like Gammons leaking that Clemens and Damon are users and then nothing coming down the pike about it. Who cares who uses. If and when they're caught, suspensions will be handed out. Until then, these faux-insiders are just flapping their gums.

Posted by: MJ [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 11:17 AM

I genuinely don't care about steroids. Not that I'm in favor of guys cheating; I'm just tired of hearing about it.
===============

"Cheating is baseball's oldest profession. No other game is so rich in skullduggery, so suited to it or so proud of it." - Thomas Boswell

Posted by: Raf [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 3, 2005 02:11 PM